Key result
Physician-guided telemonitoring boosts systolic time in target range by ~16 percentage points over telemonitoring alone.
Why the study?
Does structured physician-guided telemedical care with biweekly telephone consultations improve blood pressure time in target range at 6 months compared with home blood pressure telemonitoring alone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT (n=60)
1:1
No
Does structured physician-guided telemedical care with biweekly telephone consultations improve blood pressure time in target range at 6 months compared with home blood pressure telemonitoring alone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension?
Structured physician-guided telemonitoring with biweekly telephone consultations significantly improves blood pressure control and time in target range compared to telemonitoring alone, with effects sustained up to 6 months after active telephone support ends.
Physician-guided telemonitoring may improve systolic TTR in uncontrolled hypertension; leaves open confirmation of durability and scalability in larger trials.
Background Blood pressure (BP) control remains insufficient in routine practice despite effective pharmacological therapy. Lack of structured follow-up and insufficient treatment intensification are major barriers. Telemonitoring may enable proactive management and overcome these limitations. Purpose To determine whether structured physician-guided telemedical care improves BP control and sustains treatment effects compared with telemonitoring alone in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Methods In this single-centre, randomized controlled pilot trial, 60 patients with uncontrolled hypertension were randomized (1:1) to home BP telemonitoring alone or telemonitoring plus structured biweekly telephone consultations with a study physician enabling treatment optimisation. Patients performed twice-daily home BP measurements with automated data transmission. Clinical visits occurred at 6 and 12 months with crossover after 6 months. The primary outcome was time in target range (TTR) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included TTR at 12 months, and medication adherence. Results Mean age of 61±13 years, 61% were male. Baseline BP was 161±17/97±12 mmHg and comparable between groups. At 6 months, physician-led telemonitoring resulted in markedly greater systolic (-15.0±9.8 vs. -4.0±8.7 mmHg) and diastolic BP reduction (-9.8±6.7 vs. -1.8±5.6 mmHg; both p<0.001). Systolic TTR was significantly higher (52.2±24.2 vs. 36.0±29.2%, p=0.028), accompanied by superior measurement adherence (82.2±15.4 vs. 70.5±25.9%, p=0.033). After crossover, the former control group experienced a significant additional systolic BP reduction during months 6-12 (-9.3±10.9 mmHg, p<0.001), and achieved BP levels comparable to the initial intervention group at 12 months (131±10 vs. 129±10 mmHg, p=0.428). Importantly, BP reductions achieved during the initial intervention phase were maintained after discontinuation of scheduled telephone support. Conclusion Structured physician-led telemonitoring substantially improves BP control with a sustained effect beyond active intervention phase. These findings support structured telemonitoring strategies to overcome therapeutic inertia in uncontrolled hypertension and warrant validation in larger, multicentre outcome trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagmeister et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=60). Home BP telemonitoring plus structured biweekly telephone consultations with a study physician vs. Home BP telemonitoring alone was evaluated on Time in target range (TTR) at 6 months (p=0.028). Physician-guided telemonitoring significantly increased 6-month systolic time in target range vs telemonitoring alone (52.2% vs 36.0%; p=0.028) and reduced systolic BP (-15.0 vs -4.0 mmHg; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: