Key result
Clopidogrel monotherapy showed a consistent 25% non-significant reduction in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding vs DAPT across troponin strata (troponin+: HR 0.75, P=0.181; troponin-: HR 0.75, P=0.101).
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of extended clopidogrel monotherapy versus continued DAPT stratified by troponin status needed evaluation in ACS patients with coexisting high ischemic and bleeding risks after DES implantation.
Does extended clopidogrel monotherapy reduce BARC types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) in ACS patients with high ischemic and bleeding risks after 9-12 months of DAPT post-DES across troponin strata?
RCT (n=7,758)
Randomized
Does extended clopidogrel monotherapy reduce BARC types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) in ACS patients with high ischemic and bleeding risks after 9-12 months of DAPT post-DES across troponin strata?
In high ischemic and bleeding risk ACS patients completing 9-12 months of DAPT after DES implantation, extended clopidogrel monotherapy lowers the risk of overall bleeding without increasing MACCE compared to continued DAPT, regardless of initial troponin status.
Clopidogrel monotherapy should not yet replace dual therapy in high-risk ACS; leaves open any bleeding benefit without ischemic harm in troponin subgroups.
Background Extended clopidogrel monotherapy following dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has demonstrated potential efficacy in patients receiving drug-eluting stents (DES). Purpose This prespecified subgroup analysis of the OPT-BIRISK trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of extended clopidogrel monotherapy versus continued DAPT in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients with coexisting high ischemic and bleeding risks, stratified by troponin status. Methods In the OPT-BIRISK study, 7,758 ACS patients with both high ischemic and bleeding risks who completed 9-12 months DAPT after DES implantation were randomized to receive clopidogrel monotherapy or clopidogrel plus aspirin for 9 months. The primary endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 9 months. Primary and key secondary endpoints included Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), respectively. Results Clopidogrel monotherapy demonstrated a consistent 25% non-significant reduction in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding risk across troponin strata (troponin-negative: 2.8% vs. 3.7%, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.54 - 1.06, P = 0.101; troponin-positive: 2.0% vs. 2.7%, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49 - 1.15, P = 0.181). Any bleeding risk was significantly lower with monotherapy in both subgroups (troponin-negative: 16.3% vs. 20.3%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.91, P = 0.001; troponin-positive: 12.4% vs. 15.5%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94, P = 0.008). MACCE rates were comparable between treatment arms (troponin-negative: 2.3% vs. 3.2%, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 - 1.01, P = 0.060; troponin-positive: 3.0% vs. 3.8%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55 - 1.12, P = 0.175). No significant interaction was observed for all endpoints. Conclusions In bi-risk ACS patients completing 9-12 months of DAPT post-DES, extended clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of any bleeding without increasing the risk of MACCE compared to DAPT, irrespective of troponin status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute coronary syndrome with coexisting high ischemic and bleeding risks (n=7,758). Extended clopidogrel monotherapy vs. Clopidogrel plus aspirin (DAPT) was evaluated on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 9 months (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49-1.15, p=0.181). Clopidogrel monotherapy showed a consistent 25% non-significant reduction in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding vs DAPT across troponin strata (troponin+: HR 0.75, P=0.181; troponin-: HR 0.75, P=0.101).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: