Why the study?
Does severe obesity (BMI ≥35) or the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) increase the 5-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients without prior cardiovascular or embolic events?
Does severe obesity (BMI ≥35) or the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) increase the 5-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients without prior cardiovascular or embolic events?
Severe obesity amplifies 5-year MACCE, stroke, and mortality risks in patients with a patent foramen ovale (PFO), while PFO itself triples the risk of stroke in severely obese individuals without increasing overall mortality.
Severe obesity may heighten MACCE risk in PFO; leaves open causal effects and intervention benefits.
Background The clinical impact of severe obesity on outcomes among patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO), and the incremental risk conferred by PFO among individuals with severe obesity, remain insufficiently quantified in real-world care. Methods Using a global federated electronic health record network (TriNetX), we performed two complementary propensity-score matched (1:1) time-to-event analyses with follow-up from day 1 to day 1825 after index.Analysis A: compared PFO patients with BMI ≥35 versus BMI <35.Analysis B compared BMI ≥35 patients with PFO versus BMI ≥35 patients without PFO. Patients with prior cardiovascular or embolic events were excluded before index. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Secondary endpoints included stroke and all-cause mortality. A negative-control outcome was assessed to evaluate residual bias. Results In Analysis A, BMI ≥35 was associated with higher 5-year MACCE (13.8% vs 11.9%; HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08–1.49; p=0.004), stroke (8.8% vs 5.3%; HR 1.57, 1.23–2.00; p<0.001), and all-cause mortality (10.5% vs 9.3%; HR 1.30, 1.06–1.59; p=0.010), while the negative-control outcome was neutral (HR 1.10, 0.74–1.63; p=0.61). Conversely, in Analysis B, PFO was associated with higher MACCE (15.3% vs 9.6%; HR 1.22, 1.07–1.40; p=0.003) and a marked increase in stroke risk (5.8% vs 2.4%; HR 3.20, 2.45–4.17; p<0.001), whereas all-cause mortality was neutral (HR 0.99, 0.88–1.11; p=0.86). The negative-control outcome showed no significant association (HR 0.83, 0.63–1.09; p=0.18). Conclusion Severe obesity amplifies long-term cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk among patients with PFO. Conversely, among individuals with severe obesity, PFO is strongly associated with stroke without increasing overall mortality. Neutral negative-control findings support specificity of the thromboembolic signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerniss et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: