Key result
Lowest ambulatory BP PTTR linked to ~12.2-fold higher risk of antihypertensive initiation.
Why the study?
The 2024 ESC guideline introduced stricter elevated BP thresholds, but the clinical impact on maternal and fetal outcomes of maintaining BP within these targets, assessed by percentage of time in the target range (PTTR), remained unclear.
Does maintaining ambulatory blood pressure within the 2024 ESC elevated blood pressure targets vs. hypertension targets reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and subsequent antihypertensive therapy initiation in high-risk pregnant women?
Cohort (n=1,856)
Does maintaining ambulatory blood pressure within the 2024 ESC elevated blood pressure targets vs. hypertension targets reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and subsequent antihypertensive therapy initiation in high-risk pregnant women?
In high-risk pregnancies, hypertension-based ambulatory blood pressure percentage of time in target range (PTTR) provides a more reliable reference for risk stratification than the stricter 2024 ESC elevated BP threshold, which showed a U-shaped risk curve with potential fetal risks at lower BP levels.
May flag high-risk pregnancies for closer antihypertensive monitoring; leaves open whether PTTR targeting improves outcomes.
Background The 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline introduced stricter “elevated blood pressure (BP)” thresholds. However, the clinical impact of maintaining BP within these targets, assessed by the percentage of time in the target range (PTTR), on maternal and fetal outcomes remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the association between PTTR derived from the 2024 ESC criteria and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) and the risk of subsequent antihypertensive therapy initiation. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 1,856 high-risk pregnant women. The study quantified ambulatory BP-derived PTTR based on the 2024 ESC elevated BP and hypertension thresholds, and employed multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the risk of initiating subsequent antihypertensive therapy. Furthermore, this study analysed associations with APOs using restricted cubic splines and logistic regression. Results PTTR showed mild to moderate negative correlations with office BP. The lowest PTTR tertile was significantly associated with a higher risk of subsequent antihypertensive therapy initiation (HR 7.28 for the elevated BP threshold and HR 12.17 for the hypertension threshold), particularly during the 28-34-week window. PTTR-hypertension demonstrated a non-linear decreasing association, identifying a 66% safety threshold below which risks increased. In contrast, PTTR-elevated BP exhibited a U-shaped relationship, suggesting increased risk at both low and high BP exposure levels. Moreover, PTTR-hypertension outperformed office BP in predicting maternal outcomes (AUC 0.757 vs 0.714). Conclusions Comparing the 2024 elevated BP and hypertension ambulatory BP thresholds, the hypertension-based PTTR provides a more reliable reference for risk stratification and monitoring in high-risk pregnancies. It serves as a practical ambulatory BP marker to guide BP management, whereas strict adherence to elevated BP targets challenges the 'lower is better' paradigm due to potential fetal risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in High-risk pregnancy (n=1,856). Ambulatory BP percentage of time in target range (PTTR) based on 2024 ESC thresholds vs. Higher PTTR tertiles and office BP was evaluated on Subsequent antihypertensive therapy initiation and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) (HR 12.17). Lowest ambulatory BP PTTR tertile increased antihypertensive initiation risk (HR 12.17 hypertension, HR 7.28 elevated BP), and PTTR-hypertension best predicted maternal outcomes (AUC 0.757 vs 0.714).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: