Key result
Stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic AMI linked to ~5-fold higher in-hospital mortality vs. normoglycemia.
Why the study?
Although diabetes mellitus is an established risk factor after AMI, the prognostic impact of stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients remains incompletely characterized, particularly in transitional healthcare systems.
Does admission stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients or known diabetes increase in-hospital mortality compared to normoglycemic non-diabetic patients in individuals hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=13,099)
No
Does admission stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients or known diabetes increase in-hospital mortality compared to normoglycemic non-diabetic patients in individuals hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction?
In patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, admission stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetics identifies a very high-risk phenotype with in-hospital mortality (22.2%) exceeding both normoglycemic non-diabetics (4.2%) and patients with established diabetes (11.0%).
Higher in-hospital mortality in this AMI subgroup signals need for closer monitoring; leaves open whether targeted glucose control improves outcomes.
Abstract Stress hyperglycemia exceeds known diabetes in predicting in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction: An 11-year national study of 13,099 patients Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-established risk factor for adverse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the prognostic impact of stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic patients remains incompletely characterized, particularly in transitional healthcare systems. Aim To evaluate the clinical profile, management, temporal trends, and in-hospital outcomes of AMI patients according to known diabetes status and admission stress hyperglycemia in a nationwide 11-year cohort. Methods We analyzed 13,099 consecutive AMI patients hospitalized between 2014–2024 at Kosovo’s main tertiary cardiology center. Patients were classified as known diabetes or no known diabetes. Among non-diabetics, stress hyperglycemia was defined as admission glucose >11.1 mmol/L. Clinical characteristics, invasive management, and in-hospital mortality were compared. Annual trends were assessed using logistic regression. Results Known diabetes was present in 36.3% (n=4,759) of patients. Diabetic patients were older, more frequently female, and had higher prevalence of hypertension and reduced LVEF (all p<0.001). They underwent less coronary angiography (67.8% vs 71.9%) and PCI (48.4% vs 55.6%; both p<0.001) and had higher in-hospital mortality (11.0% vs 6.7%; p<0.001). Among non-diabetics (n=8,340), 641 (7.7%) presented with stress hyperglycemia. This group had markedly higher mortality compared with normoglycemic non-diabetics (22.2% vs 4.2%; p<0.001) and even higher than known diabetics (22.2% vs 11.0%). They also had lower LVEF, worse renal function, and underwent less PCI (52.7% vs 60.6%; p<0.001). The proportion of AMI patients with known diabetes increased significantly over time (OR per year 1.032; 95% CI 1.019–1.045; p<0.001). Conclusions In this large real-world AMI cohort, both known diabetes and stress hyperglycemia were associated with worse in-hospital outcomes. Importantly, stress hyperglycemia identified a highest-risk phenotype with mortality exceeding that of established diabetes. These findings highlight the need for systematic glycemic assessment and aggressive metabolic management in all AMI patients, regardless of diabetes history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajraktari et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=13,099). Admission stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetics (admission glucose >11.1 mmol/L) vs. Normoglycemic non-diabetics and known diabetes was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.001). Stress hyperglycemia in non-diabetic AMI patients had higher in-hospital mortality than normoglycemic non-diabetics (22.2% vs 4.2%; p<0.001) and known diabetics (11.0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from European Heart Journal