Key result
Integrated insulin resistance index linked to ~11% higher all-cause mortality per SD.
Why the study?
The triglyceride glucose index and HOMA2-IR capture only single components of insulin resistance, and whether integrating complementary lipidic and endocrine pathways improves prognostic discrimination in patients at cardiovascular risk remained unclear.
Does a novel integrated insulin resistance index (iIR) combining fasting glucose, triglycerides, and insulin improve prognostic discrimination for long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to TyG and HOMA2-IR in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Cohort (n=3,245)
Does a novel integrated insulin resistance index (iIR) combining fasting glucose, triglycerides, and insulin improve prognostic discrimination for long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to TyG and HOMA2-IR in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
An integrated insulin resistance index combining fasting glucose, triglycerides, and insulin is independently associated with both 10-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography, outperforming single-pathway indices like TyG and HOMA2-IR.
Background Insulin resistance (IR) is associated with lipid metabolism disorders, glucose intolerance, and cardiovascular disease. The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) reflect distinct metabolic and endocrine dimensions of IR. However, these indices capture only single components of a complex metabolic phenotype. Whether integrating complementary pathways of IR improves prognostic discrimination in patients at cardiovascular risk remains unclear. Purpose To evaluate the associations of TyG, HOMA2-IR, and a novel integrated insulin resistance index (iIR), combining fasting glucose, triglycerides, and insulin, with long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Methods We analysed 3,245 individuals (mean age 62.7±10.6 years; 69.7% men) undergoing coronary angiography with a median follow-up of 10 years. The iIR was constructed as a standardised composite of fasting glucose, triglycerides, and insulin. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for a 1-standard-deviation increase, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, renal function, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, LDL cholesterol, and coronary artery disease status. Results In fully adjusted models, iIR was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03–1.19; p=0.0047) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.21; p=0.028). TyG remained associated with all-cause mortality only (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16; p=0.021), whereas HOMA2-IR was not independently associated with either endpoint (all-cause HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98–1.10; cardiovascular HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93–1.09). Conclusions An integrated assessment of insulin resistance combining lipidic and endocrine components provides more consistent prognostic information than established single-pathway indices. Integrative characterisation of insulin resistance may enhance cardiometabolic risk stratification beyond conventional single-pathway markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moissl-Blanke et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected or established coronary artery disease undergoing coronary angiography (n=3,245). Integrated insulin resistance index (iIR; composite of fasting glucose, triglycerides, and insulin) vs. 1-SD lower iIR / comparison with single-pathway indices (TyG, HOMA2-IR) was evaluated on Long-term all-cause mortality (co-primary with cardiovascular mortality) (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19, p=0.0047). The integrated insulin resistance index (iIR) independently predicted all-cause (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19; p=0.0047) and CV mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21; p=0.028) per 1-SD increase.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: