Key result
High-intensity family caregiving is not associated with specialized CVD healthcare visits.
Why the study?
To enable family caregivers to provide sustained support as demand for informal care increases, it was important to examine how high-intensity family caregivers use specialised healthcare for CVD compared with non-caregivers.
Does providing high-intensity informal family care increase specialised healthcare visits for cardiovascular diseases compared to non-caregivers?
Cohort (n=125,874)
Yes
Does providing high-intensity informal family care increase specialised healthcare visits for cardiovascular diseases compared to non-caregivers?
While overall cardiovascular-related specialised healthcare visits do not differ between high-intensity family caregivers and controls, younger caregivers (<65 years) have an increased rate of visits for hypertensive diseases, whereas older caregivers (≥65 years) have fewer visits for heart failure and cerebrovascular diseases.
No overall difference in CVD visits among caregivers; leaves open age-specific effects on hypertension and cerebrovascular disease.
Background As the population ages, demand for informal care increases. To enable family caregivers to provide sustained support, it is important to recognise their use of healthcare services and the health risks they face. This study aimed to examine how family caregivers providing high-intensity care used specialised healthcare for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) compared with non-caregivers. Methods In 2012, all officially recognised family caregivers in Finland (n = 42,256, mean age 67, 71% women) were identified from a national register. A matched control group was selected by age, sex, and municipality of residence (n = 83,618). Information on specialised healthcare visits due to CVDs was obtained from the national Care Register for Health Care for 2012–2017. Data were analysed using general linear models adjusted for socioeconomic status and urbanisation level of the municipality of residence. Results Overall, there was no significant difference in the total number of CVD-related specialised healthcare visits between caregivers and controls. Caregivers had 381 CVD-related visits per 1000 person-years, compared with 379 for controls. Caregivers under 65 years of age had more visits due to hypertensive diseases than controls of the same age with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 1.22 (95% confidence interval 1.04–1.45). Caregivers 65 years or older had fewer visits due to cerebrovascular diseases (0.90, 0.82–0.98) and heart failure (0.88, 0.81–0.95) than their controls. There were no differences in other major CVD groups, i.e. ischaemic heart diseases, peripheral artery diseases, or arrhythmias. Conclusions This research enhances our understanding of CVD-related healthcare visits and the occurrence of specific CVDs among younger and older family caregivers. A better understanding of morbidity enables proactive steps to protect family caregivers’ health before critical situations arise. Key messages • High-intensity family caregivers did not differ significantly from controls in the number of specialised healthcare visits for cardiovascular disease. • Family caregivers <65 years of age had more specialised healthcare visits than controls for hypertensive diseases, while those ≥65 years had fewer visits for cerebrovascular diseases and heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehmuskallio et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular diseases among family caregivers (n=125,874). High-intensity family caregiving vs. Matched non-caregiver controls was evaluated on Total number of CVD-related specialised healthcare visits per 1000 person-years. High-intensity family caregivers had no significant difference in overall CVD-related specialised healthcare visits compared with controls (381 vs 379 per 1000 person-years).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: