Key result
Brazilian Indigenous adults show an overall pooled hypertension prevalence of ~8%.
Meta-Analysis (n=9,449)
Yes
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates a highly heterogeneous burden of hypertension among Brazilian Indigenous adults (pooled prevalence 8.2%, prediction interval 0.3–73.2%), with higher prevalence observed in older populations and more recent study periods, underscoring the need for standardized research and culturally tailored cardiovascular prevention strategies.
Heterogeneous hypertension prevalence among Brazilian Indigenous adults may inform age-stratified monitoring; leaves open the need for standardized prospective surveillance to clarify temporal trends.
Background Hypertension (HTN) is a major public health issue, with increasing prevalence among Brazilian Indigenous adults, yet its distribution and underlying patterns remain insufficiently characterized. In these populations, social and structural factors, including urbanization and access to healthcare, may play an important role in shaping cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to systematically assess HTN prevalence and explore patterns across different populations. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cross-sectional studies reporting HTN prevalence among Indigenous adults in Brazil. Five databases were searched without language restrictions. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled prevalence, and subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024626440). Results Twenty-two studies (1989 to 2024), comprising 9,449 Indigenous adults, were included in the systematic review. Seventeen population-specific estimates, comprising 5,908 individuals and 1,209 with HTN, met the predefined diagnostic criteria and were included in the primary meta-analysis. The pooled HTN prevalence was 8.2% (95% CI, 3.9–16.4%), with substantial between-estimate heterogeneity (I²=94.3%; 95% prediction interval, 0.3–73.2%). Studies with a mean age ≥ 40 years showed a higher pooled prevalence (19.5%) than those with a mean age < 40 years (3.6%). Meta-regression identified year of data collection and mean age as significant moderators, explaining 39.1% and 17.1% of between-estimate heterogeneity, respectively. Geographic region and area of residence were not significant moderators. The substantial heterogeneity and incomplete reporting of relevant population characteristics limited the interpretation of contextual factors. Conclusion HTN prevalence among Brazilian Indigenous populations was highly heterogeneous across the populations represented in the available evidence. Although differences were observed according to age, geographic context, and study period, these findings should not be interpreted as population-level regional estimates or as evidence of an independent effect of urbanization. Substantial heterogeneity and methodological limitations restrict causal inference and precise estimation of HTN prevalence across all Brazilian Indigenous populations. These findings highlight the need for standardized, culturally sensitive research and context-specific public health strategies addressing hypertension prevention, screening, management, and health disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomes et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension (n=9,449). Brazilian Indigenous adult status was evaluated on Pooled prevalence of hypertension (SBP ≥140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥90 mmHg and/or antihypertensive treatment) (Prevalence 8.2%, 95% CI 3.9-16.4%, p=<0.0001). Brazilian Indigenous adult populations had a pooled hypertension prevalence of 8.2% (95% CI, 3.9–16.4%) with substantial heterogeneity across groups (I²=94.3%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: