Key result
Moderate-to-severe abdominal aortic calcification linked to ~2.8-fold higher risk of calcific aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAS) remains significantly underdiagnosed in ageing populations, making the identification of individuals at risk an important healthcare need. This study evaluated whether abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) detected during bone density testing is associated with incident CAS.
Does the presence of moderate-or-severe abdominal aortic calcification on DXA lateral spine images predict incident calcific aortic valve stenosis compared to low abdominal aortic calcification in women aged >=70 years?
Cohort (n=1,046)
Does the presence of moderate-or-severe abdominal aortic calcification on DXA lateral spine images predict incident calcific aortic valve stenosis compared to low abdominal aortic calcification in women aged >=70 years?
Routine evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification on lateral spine images during DXA bone density testing can identify older women at substantially higher risk of developing incident calcific aortic valve stenosis.
Moderate-to-severe AAC was associated with higher incident CAS risk in older women; hypothesis-generating for AAC as a marker during DXA screening.
Introduction Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAS) is the third most common cardiac condition in high-income countries, and the burden of this disease is increasing with the ageing populations of high-income countries. But CAS remains significantly underdiagnosed and identifying individuals at risk for this valvulopathy is a healthcare imperative. The target cohort for population-based osteoporosis screening are elderly, more likely to lead sedentary lives and to smoke. They are therefore at increased risk for CAS.[1] Purpose The current study aims to assess if there is an association between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and incident CAS. Methods We undertook a prospective study of 1,046 women ≥70 years of age who had lateral spine imaging taken at the time of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone density testing. These images were analysed by an experienced investigator using an established technique to assess the extent of AAC.[2, 3] The severity of AAC was described using a 24-point Kaupilla scale score (AAC-24), and classified using previously established categories of low (AAC-24 of 0 or 1) vs moderate-or-severe (AAC-24 ≥2).[2] Incident CAS over 14.5 years of follow up was identified by linked hospital data and death records. Results There were 578 women (55%) with moderate-to-severe AAC. Over 14.5 years, 34 women (3.3%) experienced incident CAS, and 31 of these patients suffered subsequent hospitalisation or death from any cause after their diagnosis of CAS. The presence of moderate-or-severe AAC was associated with a 2.5-to-3-fold increase in the relative hazard of incident CAS in the adjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.81; 95% CI, 1.27-6.20, p = 0.011), compared to women with low AAC. Conclusions Older women with higher levels of AAC, identified using DXA lateral spine images, are at substantially higher risk of incident CAS. Given the widespread use of DXA machines in women over the age of 65 years, the routine evaluation of AAC at the time of bone density testing may provide a valuable risk stratification mechanism for incident CAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courtney et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Calcific aortic valve stenosis (n=1,046). Moderate-or-severe abdominal aortic calcification (AAC-24 ≥2) vs. Low abdominal aortic calcification (AAC-24 of 0 or 1) was evaluated on Incident calcific aortic valve stenosis (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.27-6.20, p=0.011). Moderate-or-severe abdominal aortic calcification on DXA was associated with an increased hazard of incident calcific aortic valve stenosis compared to low calcification (HR 2.81; 95% CI 1.27-6.20).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: