Key result
Integrated TAVI governance controls unit-cost growth amid an ~82% rise in regional expenditures.
Why the study?
Rapidly rising TAVI volumes, increasing device expenditure, and the 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines lowering the recommended age threshold from 75 to 70 years create a governance challenge for regional health systems to align technology adoption with evidence maturity, equity of access, and financial sustainability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Embedding eligibility criteria, volume standards, multidisciplinary Heart Team assessment, and centralized procurement into a regional health system's organizational model provides a transferable framework to manage the rapid expansion and rising costs of TAVI.
Issue/problem TAVI volumes and related device expenditure have increased rapidly across European health systems. The 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines lowered the recommended age threshold from 75 to 70 years, anticipating expansion of eligible populations. This creates a governance challenge for regional health systems: aligning technology adoption with evidence maturity, equity of access and financial sustainability. Description of the problem Administrative data from Emilia‑Romagna (Italy, 4.5M inhabitants) showed TAVI procedures rising from 699 (2019) to 1252 (2024) – 209 per million inhabitants, twice the 2019 projection – with an 82% increase in device expenditure (€17M/year). In response, the Region introduced an integrated governance framework (2025–2026) combining independent appraisal of international guidelines, regionally defined eligibility criteria, centralised procurement and real‑time outcome monitoring. Results Clinical governance was operationalised through binding organisational standards: mandatory Heart Team evaluation with geriatric assessment for frail patients (Clinical Frailty Scale 3–7); minimum activity thresholds (≥100 TAVI/year per hub; ≥50 per operator); unified waiting lists; a platform‑level clinical‑organisational coordinator; and explicit outcome targets. Independent appraisal supported the ≥75‑year age threshold, while preserving access for younger high‑risk or inoperable patients. Centralised procurement contributed to containing unit‑cost growth. Lessons Clinical governance of high‑cost devices is effective only when embedded in the organisational model itself. Integrating eligibility criteria, structured multidisciplinary assessment, volume standards and procurement into a coherent system strengthens accountability mechanisms that isolated policy instruments cannot achieve. The model is transferable to other high‑cost technologies and to health systems with comparable regional planning capacity. Key messages • The rapid expansion of high-cost device indications and rising expenditures challenge regional health systems to align technology adoption with evidence maturity and financial sustainability. • Effective clinical governance embeds eligibility, volume standards, multidisciplinary assessment and procurement across the health system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rallo et al. (2026) studied Aortic valve disease requiring Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Integrated clinical governance framework for TAVI was evaluated on Operationalization of clinical governance standards and containment of unit-cost growth. An integrated TAVI governance framework (≥100/year per hub, ≥75-year threshold) addressed an 82% expenditure rise (€17M/year) and contained unit-cost growth.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: