Key result
PCSK9 inhibitors linked to ~61% lower LDL-C in patients with PAD.
Why the study?
Randomized evidence supports using PCSK9i in patients with peripheral arterial disease, but real-world data on PCSK9i use and efficacy in this population remain limited.
Does PCSK9 inhibitor therapy (evolocumab or alirocumab) reduce LDL-cholesterol and improve achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets in real-world patients with peripheral arterial disease?
Observational (n=124)
Yes
Does PCSK9 inhibitor therapy (evolocumab or alirocumab) reduce LDL-cholesterol and improve achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets in real-world patients with peripheral arterial disease?
In a real-world Italian cohort of patients with peripheral arterial disease, PCSK9 inhibitors achieved a 61.1% median reduction in LDL-C with high treatment adherence (98.3%) and no reported adverse events, with higher target attainment when used alongside statins (72% vs 51%).
Background/Introduction Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering improves outcomes in PAD, and randomized evidence supports the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) on top of statin ± ezetimibe therapy. Yet, real-world data on PCSK9i use and efficacy in this population remain limited. Purpose AT-TARGET-IT is an Italian, multicenter, observational registry on the use of PCSK9i in clinical practice. The purpose of this subanalysis was to investigate efficacy and safety of PCSK9i in patients with PAD. Methods Patients with PAD initiating evolocumab or alirocumab (75, 150 or 300 mg), according to ESC/EAS Guidelines indications and national reimbursement criteria, were enrolled in the AT-TARGET-IT registry. Clinical characteristics and lipid profile were collected at baseline and at subsequent follow-ups. Efficacy endpoints included LDL-C reduction and achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. Results A total of 124 patients with PAD were enrolled in the AT-TARGET-IT registry (61.3% male, median age 59 years), of whom 118 had at least one follow-up recorded. Of these patients, 61.3% had hypertension, 17.7% had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 21.8% had a previous history of lower limb revascularization. Baseline median ankle brachial index (ABI) was 0.8 (IQR 0.7-0.9), and most patients had symptomatic PAD, predominantly Fontaine stage IIa (30.6%) and IIb (48.4%), while stage III accounted for 17.7%, and stages I and IV were rare (1.6% each). Among patients with at least one follow-up, baseline median LDL-C was 127.1 mg/dL (IQR 101.4-156.4) and decreased to 53.3 mg/dL (IQR 41.2-63.5) after a median time of 17.5 months (p<0.001). Median LDL-C percentage reduction was 61.1% (p<0.001), with 57.6% of patients achieving LDL-C target according to CV risk classification. 43 patients (36%) of PAD patients were on statin therapy, with 31 (72%) of them achieving LDL-C target compared with 51% of PAD patients without statin. Adherence was high (≥80%) in 98.3% of patients, whereas PCSK9i were discontinued in only 2.5% of patients with PAD. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion(s) In this real-world cohort of patients with PAD, PCSK9i provided substantial LDL-C reduction and high adherence. Target attainment was observed in the majority of patients when PCSK9i were used on top of statins. These findings are consistent with major clinical trials and support use of PCSK9i tolerability in real-world clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Peripheral artery disease (PAD) (n=124). PCSK9 inhibitors (evolocumab or alirocumab) vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) or statin vs non-statin use was evaluated on LDL-C percentage reduction and achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets (p=<0.001). PCSK9 inhibitors reduced median LDL-C by 61.1% (from 127.1 to 53.3 mg/dL, p<0.001) over 17.5 months in PAD patients, with 57.6% achieving guideline LDL-C targets.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: