Key result
Integrated polygenic risk score independently predicts 10-year coronary atheroma and non-calcified plaque progression.
Why the study?
Does an integrated polygenic risk score (iPRS) improve the prediction of baseline coronary plaque burden and 10-year plaque progression compared to pooled cohort equations (PCE) alone in patients suspected of coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=288)
Does an integrated polygenic risk score (iPRS) improve the prediction of baseline coronary plaque burden and 10-year plaque progression compared to pooled cohort equations (PCE) alone in patients suspected of coronary artery disease?
Integrating polygenic risk with clinical pooled cohort equations significantly improves the prediction of 10-year coronary plaque progression and reclassifies nearly 20% of patients compared to clinical risk scores alone.
Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly heritable and clinical risk scores may insufficiently capture the full spectrum of individual risk. We investigated whether integrated polygenic risk score (iPRS) derived from a combination of genetic and clinical risk factors is associated with coronary plaque phenotypes and 10-year coronary plaque progression. Methods Patients suspected of CAD (N=288, mean age 58 ± 7 years; 60% male) underwent AI-analyzed serial coronary CTA at baseline and after a median of 10.2 years follow-up. We evaluated the association of iPRS - which combines a CAD PRS with pooled cohort equations (PCE) into an absolute 10 year risk estimate – with baseline burden and 10-year progression of percent atheroma volume (PAV) and percent non-calcified plaque volume (PNCP). Patients were stratified into low/borderline (<7.5%), intermediate (≥7.5% to <20%), and high (≥20%) 10-year risk categories. Clinical utility was assessed using a reclassification matrix and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) to investigate the benefit of iPRS compared to PCE alone for prediction of above-median plaque progression. Results iPRS was a robust, independent predictor of both baseline plaque burden and 10-year plaque progression. After adjustment for genetic principal components, iPRS was significantly associated with baseline PAV (Beta: 0.211 [95% CI: 0.128-0.294]; P<0.001) and PNCP (Beta: 0.094 [95% CI: 0.044-0.143]; P<0.001). For longitudinal changes, iPRS was significantly associated with 10-year progression of PAV (Beta: 0.118 [95% CI: 0.075-0.162]; P<0.001) and PNCP (Beta: 0.074 [95% CI: 0.045-0.102]; P=<0.001). Compared to PCE, iPRS reclassified 57 patients (19.8%) across clinical risk levels (28 higher, 29 lower). For 10-year PNCP progression, the iPRS demonstrated a significant continuous NRI of 0.403 (95% CI: 0.184–0.619; P<0.001). This improvement was predominantly driven by the superior identification of true progressors (NRI+ Cases: 0.389). Conclusion Integrating genetic data with clinical risk scores significantly improves prediction of both baseline coronary plaque and 10-year plaque progression. iPRS is effective at identifying patients with a genetic predisposition for high-risk non-calcified plaque progression, providing an opportunity for targeted prevention strategies.iprs_table
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weijs et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=288). Integrated polygenic risk score (iPRS) vs. Pooled cohort equations (PCE) alone was evaluated on 10-year progression of percent atheroma volume (PAV) and percent non-calcified plaque volume (PNCP) (Beta 0.118, 95% CI 0.075-0.162, p=<0.001). Integrated polygenic risk score independently predicted 10-year progression of percent atheroma volume (Beta 0.118; 95% CI 0.075-0.162; P<0.001) and non-calcified plaque volume (Beta 0.074; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: