Why the study?
The predictive capacity of a polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus (PRS-D) and its incremental predictive value when combined with behavioural and clinical risk factors required evaluation.
Does adding a 15-variant polygenic risk score (PRS-D) to behavioural and clinical risk factors improve the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults?
Case-Control (n=2,097)
No
Does adding a 15-variant polygenic risk score (PRS-D) to behavioural and clinical risk factors improve the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults?
Adding a 15-locus polygenic risk score to traditional clinical and behavioural factors (hypertension, obesity, sedentary lifestyle) significantly improves the discriminative prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus, although classical risk factors remain the strongest independent predictors.
Introduction Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the fastest-growing noncommunicable multifactorial and polygenic diseases, leading to many health complications and significant morbidity and mortality. Aim Investigate the predictive capacity of a polygenic risk score with genetic variants associated with T2DM (PRS-D), and evaluate the increase in predictive value when other behavioural and clinical risk factors are added. Methods A case–control study was conducted with T2DM patients from our centre’s dataset and controls without diabetes or pre-diabetes. DNA samples were genotyped for 15 genetic polymorphisms associated with T2DM and oxidation (IGF2BP2 rs4402960, PPARG rs1801282, TCF7L2 rs7903146, SLC30A8 rs1326634, MC4R rs17782313, ADIPOQ rs266729, FTO rs8050136, TAS2R50 rs1376251, HNF4A rs1884613, MTHFD1L rs6922269, MTHFR677 rs1801133, MTHFR rs1298, PON108 rs705379, PON192 rs662, PON55 rs854560). A weighted PRS-D was calculated by summing all risk alleles multiplied by their respective odds ratios (ORs). T2DM relative risk was assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) evaluated behavioural and clinical factors (hypertension, obesity, and sedentary lifestyle) alone and combined with PRS-D. Results Our population included 2,097 participants: 846 T2DM patients (mean age 55.3±6.9; 78.7% male) and 1,251 controls (mean age 51.4±8.5; 71.9% male). PRS-D was significantly higher in patients than controls (12.5±2.6 vs. 12.0±2.5; p<0.0001). Bivariate analysis of risk factors showed that patients had 79.9% hypertension, 44.3% obesity, and 63.6% sedentary lifestyle. Adding PRS-D to risk factors improved basal model discrimination, increasing the AUC for sedentary lifestyle (0.614→0.691), hypertension (0.665→0.710), and obesity (0.598→0.689). The DeLong test confirmed significance (p<0.0001). After multivariate analysis adjusting for age and sex, physical inactivity, obesity, and hypertension, the PRS-D remained significantly associated with T2DM. PRS-D increased risk by 9.1% per unit (OR=1.091; 95% CI: 1.050–1.133), while sedentary lifestyle (OR=2.121), obesity (OR=1.588), and hypertension (OR=3.042) showed robust independent associations. Conclusions PRS-D is associated with T2DM susceptibility and improves disease prediction even with a limited number of loci. PRS may support early risk stratification and personalised prevention strategies. Further studies may optimise its use for clinical and public health applications, though classical risk factors remain the strongest predictors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=2,097). 15-SNP polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes (PRS-D) combined with behavioural and clinical risk factors vs. Behavioural and clinical risk factors alone / controls without diabetes or pre-diabetes was evaluated on Type 2 diabetes mellitus susceptibility and predictive model discrimination (OR 1.091, 95% CI 1.050-1.133, p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: