Key result
Severe MAC is linked to ~2.9-fold higher risk of delayed 1-year wound healing.
Why the study?
Many patients with CLTI experience hemodynamic failure despite technically successful revascularization, yet the clinical consequences and factors influencing outcomes in this population had not been systematically studied.
Do anatomical and clinical factors such as severe small artery disease (SAD), severe medial arterial calcification (MAC), and lower serum albumin predict 1-year wound healing in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients with hemodynamic failure following endovascular therapy?
Observational (n=420)
Yes
Do anatomical and clinical factors such as severe small artery disease (SAD), severe medial arterial calcification (MAC), and lower serum albumin predict 1-year wound healing in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients with hemodynamic failure following endovascular therapy?
In CLTI patients with hemodynamic failure following endovascular therapy, an acceptable 1-year wound healing rate of 60.5% is achieved overall, though severe small artery disease, severe medial arterial calcification, and hypoalbuminemia significantly delay healing and stratify risk.
Background Although revascularization is the primary treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), a substantial proportion of patients experience hemodynamic failure despite a technically successful procedure. The clinical consequences and the factors influencing outcomes in this specific patient population have not been systematically studied. Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the 1-year clinical outcomes and their associated factors in CLTI patients who had hemodynamic failure following endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive 420 patients (median age: 77 years [70, 84], male: 64.3%, diabetes mellitus: 68.6%, hemodialysis: 55.2%, post-EVT skin perfusion pressure: 26 [20, 32] mmHg, clinical stage of Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection [WIfI] classification 4: 47.4%) with CLTI who underwent EVT and were subsequently diagnosed with hemodynamic failure, defined as a post-revascularization skin perfusion pressure (SPP) < 40 mmHg. All angiograms were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. Anatomical factors, including small artery disease (SAD), scored based on network of forefoot and calcaneal arteries, and medial arterial calcification (MAC), scored based on below-the-ankle artery calcification severity, were systematically evaluated. The outcome measure was the 1-year wound healing rate, defined as complete epithelialization without any major amputation. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of delayed wound healing. Results Severe SAD and MAC were present in 43.3% and 33.7% of patients, respectively. The overall Kaplan-Meier estimate for the 1-year wound healing rate was 60.5%. In the multivariate analysis, lower serum albumin (<3.5 g/dL) (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.68, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.01-2.82, p=0.048), severe SAD (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.12-4.96, p=0.024), and severe MAC (HR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.49-5.48, p=0.002) were significantly associated with delayed wound healing. The 1-year wound healing rate was markedly stratified by the presence of these anatomical risk factors: the rate was 75.7% in patients with neither severe SAD nor severe MAC, but only 33.6% in those with both conditions. Conclusion The current study revealed that an acceptable 1-year wound healing rate can still be achieved in CLTI patients with hemodynamic failure after EVT. Risk stratification based on the assessment of severe SAD and MAC would be crucial for guiding further management in this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iida et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with hemodynamic failure following endovascular therapy (n=420). Severe small artery disease (SAD) and severe medial arterial calcification (MAC) vs. Neither severe SAD nor severe MAC was evaluated on 1-year wound healing rate (complete epithelialization without any major amputation) (HR 2.85, 95% CI 1.49-5.48, p=0.002). Severe SAD (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.12-4.96) and severe MAC (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.49-5.48) predicted delayed 1-year wound healing (33.6% with both vs 75.7% with neither).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: