Key result
Multiple elevated biomarkers linked to ~95% higher MACE risk across CKM stages.
Why the study?
The stage-specific evolution of risk drivers in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome remains underexplored, prompting evaluation of the comparative and cumulative prognostic value of Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Cystatin C (CysC), and hsCRP for MACE across CKM stages 0-3.
Does an aggregate risk score of ≥2 elevated biomarkers (Fatty Liver Index, Cystatin C, and hsCRP) predict incident MACE across Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) stages 0–3 compared to having 0–1 elevated biomarkers?
Cohort (n=382,797)
Yes
Does an aggregate risk score of ≥2 elevated biomarkers (Fatty Liver Index, Cystatin C, and hsCRP) predict incident MACE across Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) stages 0–3 compared to having 0–1 elevated biomarkers?
An aggregate biomarker score integrating hepatic steatosis (FLI), renal stress (CysC), and systemic inflammation (hsCRP) improves MACE risk discrimination across CKM stages 0–3, particularly unmasking residual risk in Stage 0 and 1 individuals.
Background The stage-specific evolution of risk drivers in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome remains underexplored. This study evaluated the comparative and cumulative prognostic value of Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Cystatin C (CysC), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) across CKM stages 0–3. Methods We analyzed 382,797 participants from the UK Biobank classified into CKM stages 0–3. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the risk of incident MACE associated with the three biomarkers. The primary analysis employed a binary cumulative risk strategy, categorizing participants into High-Risk (≥2 elevated biomarkers) and Low-Risk (0–1 factor) groups. Survival analyses were performed with models adjusted for established risk factors. Model discrimination was evaluated using the C-index. Results Over a median follow-up of 15.2 years, elevated FLI, CysC, and hsCRP were independently associated with MACE across all CKM stages. The categorical model provided a superior fit compared to the linear model (Chi-square 17,396.04 vs. 17,269.82; P < 0.001). Significant interactions were observed between the binary risk strategy and CKM stages (P for interaction = 0.022), with the highest relative risk observed in the early stages. In Stage 0, high-risk individuals faced a 1.95-fold higher risk of MACE (95% CI 1.45–2.61) and a 2.28-fold higher risk of cardiovascular death (95% CI 1.28–4.06). Adding the cumulative risk strategy to the clinical model improved the C-index from 0.717 to 0.730. Conclusion An aggregate score based on FLI, CysC, and hsCRP is a potent, stage-dependent predictor of future MACE risk across the CKM spectrum. By unmasking residual risk in seemingly low-risk Stage 0 and 1 populations, this strategy provides a critical window for biomarker-guided primordial prevention.Figure 1Figure 2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) syndrome stages 0–3 (n=382,797). High-Risk biomarker profile (≥2 elevated biomarkers: Fatty Liver Index, Cystatin C, hsCRP) vs. Low-Risk group (0–1 elevated biomarker) was evaluated on Incident Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.45-2.61). Having ≥2 elevated biomarkers (FLI, CysC, hsCRP) predicted higher MACE risk across CKM stages, with a 1.95-fold higher risk in Stage 0 (95% CI 1.45-2.61).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: