Key result
Digital phenotyping identifies high-risk ASCVD patients, with ~34% showing severe care gaps.
Why the study?
Scalable, implementation-ready approaches to systematically identify and prioritise patients with established ASCVD and high residual risk from suboptimal lipid control and clustered cardiometabolic comorbidities in UK primary care remain elusive.
Cross-Sectional (n=173)
Digital phenotyping combined with an additive multimorbidity score effectively identifies a concentrated cohort of very-high-risk ASCVD patients with modifiable care gaps in primary care.
Background Patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) frequently remain at high residual risk due to suboptimal lipid control and clustering of cardiometabolic comorbidities. Scalable, implementation-ready approaches to systematically identify and prioritise these individuals in UK primary care remain elusive(1). We evaluated a digitally enabled phenotyping strategy, combined with a pragmatic additive cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) care-gap score, to quantify modifiable residual burden. Methods Within a primary care population of 10,306 adults, a standardised electronic search (CVDPL2F) identified patients with established ASCVD (CHD, PCI/stent, PAD, stroke/TIA), excluding familial hypercholesterolaemia and those using inclisiran, with LDL-C >1.8 mmol/L or non-HDL >2.5 mmol/L (2). Structured EHR data were extracted cross-sectionally. A CVRM care-gap score was defined as: baseline 2 (ASCVD + LDL above target) plus 1 point each for diabetes (HbA1c >53 mmol/mol), hypertension (SBP >140 mmHg), CKD (eGFR <60), and obesity (BMI >30 kg/m²). Risk modifiers (smoker, COPD, heart failure, AF, fatty liver) were flagged but not scored. Primary analysis quantified multimorbidity burden and treatment gaps. Results Of 10,306 patients, n=173 (1.7%) met criteria. Mean age 71.1±12.2 years; 57.2% male. Mean LDL-C 2.7mmol/L; 44.5% >2.6 mmol/L. SBP >140 mmHg in 7.5%; diabetes in 24.9% (HbA1c >53: 11.6%); CKD in 26.0%; BMI >30 in 24.9%. Mean CVRM score 3.2±0.7; 33.5% scored 4 or more. Two or more risk modifiers were present in 34.7% of cases. Conclusion Digital phenotyping identified a concentrated, very-high-risk ASCVD cohort with substantial multimorbidity and modifiable care gaps. The CVRM score provides a scalable prioritisation framework for structured community-based secondary prevention. A prospective longitudinal evaluation is underway to quantify intervention intensity (pharmacological and lifestyle) and the associated change in mean CVRM score, providing an objective measure of individualised care-gap modification within primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathieson et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=173). Digitally enabled phenotyping strategy (CVDPL2F) and additive cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) care-gap score was evaluated on Multimorbidity burden and treatment gaps (quantified via CVRM care-gap score). Digital phenotyping and CVRM scoring identified 173 (1.7%) high-risk ASCVD patients with a mean CVRM score of 3.2±0.7, with 33.5% scoring ≥4.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from European Heart Journal