Why the study?
Although vitamin K antagonists have been the standard treatment for left ventricular thrombus, direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly used despite limited randomized evidence regarding their comparative efficacy and safety.
Do direct oral anticoagulants improve thrombus resolution and reduce systemic thromboembolism compared to vitamin K antagonists in adults with confirmed left ventricular thrombus?
Meta-Analysis (n=46,832)
Do direct oral anticoagulants improve thrombus resolution and reduce systemic thromboembolism compared to vitamin K antagonists in adults with confirmed left ventricular thrombus?
In observational cohorts of patients with left ventricular thrombus, DOACs were associated with superior thrombus resolution and less major bleeding compared to VKAs, though the benefit on systemic thromboembolism was not robust in sensitivity analyses.
DOACs may be considered for LV thrombus pending randomized data; leaves open confirmation of net benefit over VKAs.
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with systemic embolism, while anticoagulation carries a bleeding risk. Although vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the standard treatment, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used despite limited randomized evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in adults with confirmed LVT. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 29 November 2025. Observational cohort studies comparing DOACs versus VKAs were included. Primary outcomes were LVT resolution and systemic thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, clinically significant non-major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Random-effects meta-analyses used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and sensitivity analyses addressed outcomes dominated by large studies. Seventeen studies involving 46,832 patients (24,148 DOAC; 22,684 warfarin) were included. DOACs were associated with greater LVT resolution (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03–1.63; I² = 5%) and a lower risk of major bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34–0.99; I² = 11%) than VKAs. Although pooled analysis suggested reduced systemic thromboembolism with DOACs (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69–0.84), this association lost statistical significance after sensitivity analysis excluding a dominant study. No significant differences emerged for clinically significant non-major bleeding, any bleeding and all-cause mortality. In observational studies, DOACs were associated with improved thrombus resolution and reduced major bleeding versus VKAs. However, evidence for reduced systemic thromboembolism was not robust in sensitivity analyses. Randomized trials are needed to establish definitive treatment recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Left ventricular thrombus (n=46,832). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs / warfarin) was evaluated on Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resolution and systemic thromboembolism (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03–1.63).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: