Why the study?
International consensus guidelines specifically addressing the diagnosis and management of carcinoid heart disease are lacking, and there is considerable variation in screening and management of the disease.
Provides multidisciplinary expert consensus guidelines and practical algorithms for the screening, diagnosis, surveillance, and management of carcinoid heart disease in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
Standardizes carcinoid heart disease care in neuroendocrine tumors; extends prior consensus with practical multidisciplinary algorithms.
Carcinoid heart disease is a frequent occurrence in patients with carcinoid syndrome and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiology of carcinoid heart disease is poorly understood; however, chronic exposure to excessive circulating serotonin is considered one of the most important contributing factors. Despite recognition, international consensus guidelines specifically addressing the diagnosis and management of carcinoid heart disease are lacking. Furthermore, there is considerable variation in multiple aspects of screening and management of the disease. The aim of these guidelines was to provide succinct, practical advice on the diagnosis and management of carcinoid heart disease as well as its surveillance. Recommendations and proposed algorithms for the investigation, screening, and management have been developed based on an evidence-based review of the published data and on the expert opinion of a multidisciplinary consensus panel consisting of neuroendocrine tumor experts, including oncologists, gastroenterologists, and endocrinologists, in conjunction with cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davar et al. (2017) conducted a review in Carcinoid heart disease in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Multidisciplinary consensus guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations and algorithms for screening, diagnosing, and managing carcinoid heart disease in neuroendocrine tumor patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: