AIM: To evaluate the curing efficiency of three resin composite adhesives applied beneath 3D-printed molar bands, by determining their degree of conversion (DC%) at different depths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ). Degree of conversion (DC%) was measured at the top, middle, and bottom regions using attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). Directly irradiated specimens served as controls. Statistical analysis of DC% values was performed with regression modelling at a 5% level. RESULTS: A reduction in conversion beneath the bands compared to non-banded controls was seen, which was dependent on both the adhesive type and the region. For BLB, equally low DC% values were found for banded and non-banded specimens across all regions. Banded OBU specimens had significantly lower DC% compared to non-banded controls at all regions. Finally, TRP banded specimens had significantly lower DC% compared to non-banded controls at the middle and bottom regions, but not at the top region. CONCLUSIONS: Curing capacity of band adhesives under 3D-printed bands is material-dependent. Blue-shaded OBU and dual-cured BLB showed more uniform conversion, whereas white-shaded TRP exhibited significant depth variations. However, conversion of the adhesives tested under 3D-printed metallic bands was acceptable when a high-intensity light-curing unit was used for an extended irradiation time for orthodontic applications (30 s).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sideri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: