Short-term plasticity (STP) is fundamental to temporal information processing in biological neural systems but remains difficult to realize efficiently in neuromorphic hardware, where conventional implementations often require additional circuit elements or digital control, resulting in increased complexity and overhead. Memristive electrochemical random access memory (ECRAM) devices naturally exhibit non-equilibrium ionic dynamics that produce transient conductance modulation; however, these behaviors are typically treated as undesirable variability or tolerated as side effects in memory-centric computing paradigms. In this work, we instead exploit these volatile dynamics as a computational primitive for implementing STP through a cross-layer device–circuit–system co-design framework. We introduce a delay-feedback leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron architecture co-designed with ECRAM synapses that exploits activity-dependent conductance modulation with negligible additional circuit overhead. The architecture integrates ECRAM-based synapses with a tunable delay-feedback spike-generation path, enabling transient device dynamics to directly modulate neuron excitability and synaptic efficacy. We used experimentally characterized ECRAM devices exhibiting transient conductance modulation (∼1.5 kΩ per spike) to develop a compact behavioral model suitable for circuit-level simulation. Circuit simulations demonstrate two key STP behaviors – synaptic facilitation and intrinsic excitability modulation – while consuming 2 pJ per spike, and the same device-driven mechanisms extend across multiple neuron topologies. Network-level analysis further demonstrates frequency-selective spike processing, allowing individual synapses to act as tunable temporal filters within spiking neural networks. These results demonstrate that non-equilibrium ECRAM dynamics can be transformed from a device non-ideality into a native hardware substrate for STP and energy-efficient temporal computation in neuromorphic circuits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Currie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: