Land surface temperature (LST) retrieved from thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing is frequently hampered by cloud contamination, resulting in significant spatiotemporal data gaps. Existing all-weather reconstruction methods rely on a single strategy: machine learning requires sufficient clear-sky samples and degrades under dense cloud, whereas spatiotemporal interpolation cannot capture the non-linear relationships between LST and its controlling factors. These limitations are most severe in heterogeneous regions. To address them, we propose a robust all-weather LST reconstruction framework that integrates the XGBoost machine learning algorithm with a dynamic spatiotemporal adjacency model. XGBoost is trained separately for each day with clear-sky MODIS LST as the target and GLDAS LST, DEM, latitude and NDVI as predictors, and then predicts the missing LST of cloud-contaminated pixels; for days with insufficient clear-sky samples, an adjacency weighting model based on the nearest cloud-free days is used instead. This yields a seamless 1-km all-weather LST dataset for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region of China, with accuracy maintained across the full range of cloud conditions. Validated against MODIS LST, the model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.33 K and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.88 K over all pixels with a valid MODIS reference, and 1.32 K and 1.90 K over the 30% of clear-sky pixels withheld from training as pseudo-cloud pixels. An independent comparison with 2-m air temperature from 31 meteorological stations (ρ = 0.79) supports the spatiotemporal consistency of the reconstruction rather than its absolute accuracy. Accuracy is highest in winter (MAE = 0.99 K) and lowest in summer (MAE = 1.74 K). This framework thus overcomes TIR observational limitations, and provides high-resolution all-weather LST data for urban heat island monitoring, agricultural drought assessment, and regional climate change studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: