This qualitative descriptive study explored special education teachers’ experiences of professional development (PD), perceived changes in instructional practice and learner engagement, and contextual supports and barriers to implementation. Ten purposively selected special education teachers with approximately 5–20 years of teaching experience were drawn from public schools in Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, United States. Semi-structured, consent-based interviews lasting approximately 45–60 minutes were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to qualitative thematic analysis; transcript review and member checking supported the credibility of interpretations. Participants described practice-oriented PD involving differentiated instruction, behavior management, individualized education programs, assessment, assistive technology, and inclusive classroom strategies. They reported more intentional lesson planning, progress monitoring, explicit and scaffolded instruction, structured behavioral supports, and teacher collaboration. They also perceived greater student task engagement, participation, confidence, and behavioral independence after using these practices. Implementation was supported by instructional leadership, colleagues, mentorship, learning communities, and accessible materials, but constrained by workload, limited planning time, resource shortages, and uneven institutional support. Five central sets of themes informed the proposed Transformative and Inclusive Professional Development Enhancement Program. The findings indicate that context-responsive, collaborative, and sustained PD was valued by participants and perceived to strengthen instruction, although direct student learning outcomes were not independently measured. The study contributes a teacher-grounded basis for improving professional learning design and implementation support in special education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marvic Pulido (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: