INTRODUCTION: Surface waste mining (SWM) involves non-value-adding activities that affect operational efficiency in the mining industry. Improving fleet utilisation through real-time monitoring and coordinated dispatching can help address these challenges. OBJECTIVES: This study develops an integrated framework combining Internet of Things (IoT)-based activity recognition with dynamic fleet dispatching to improve productivity and balance excavator utilisation and tipper waiting time. METHODS: The framework comprises two phases. Phase I processes GPS and RFID telemetry to classify tipper activity states using machine learning. Phase II uses the recognised states to trigger a condition-based dispatching heuristic. A multi-objective model incorporating first-come, first-served queue recursion is evaluated through telemetry classification experiments and discrete-event simulations calibrated using operational data from an opencast coal mine in central India. RESULTS: The gradient-boosting classifier achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.986. Increasing the fleet from 20 to 36 tippers reduces average excavator idle time from 2.78 to 0.70 hours per 8-hour shift. For the existing 30-tipper fleet, the proposed framework projects a 13.6% increase in productivity, from 4,100 to 4,659 tonnes per shift. Compared with fixed assignment, the dispatching heuristic increases production by 2.5% and reduces tipper waiting time by 66%. Under heterogeneous operating conditions, the heuristic maintains excavator output imbalance at a coefficient of variation of no more than 2.4%. CONCLUSION: Integrating IoT-based activity recognition with condition-based dispatching provides a data-driven approach to improving fleet productivity and equipment utilisation in surface mining. The framework supports fleet-sizing and dispatching decisions while offering scope for extension to heterogeneous fleets and changing mine layouts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijaya Kumar Manupati (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: