This article develops the concept of pharmacologically modulated habitus to examine how psychoactive substances modify the bodily capacities through which socially acquired dispositions are enacted under the demands of a particular social space. Drawing on retrospective analytic auto(m)ethnography, a Bourdieusian conceptual framework, and long-term engagement with people who use and sell methamphetamine in the Czech Republic, the study analyzes the relationship between methamphetamine use and the embodied practice of drug dealing. The analysis distinguishes the formation of a dealing habitus through repeated participation in the drug scene from the pharmacological modulation of the bodily states and capacities through which these acquired dispositions were enacted. Empirically, the article examines how everyday dealing was organized through recurrent transactions, security practices, mobility, negotiations with clients, and interactions across heterogeneous social settings. An extended dealing episode shows how these practices converged within an accelerated regime of fragmented time, prolonged wakefulness, recurrent movement, and sustained demands on attention and bodily activity. The analysis further demonstrates how dealing involved the reproduction and conversion of different forms of capital and required flexible adaptation to clients and situations across social space. As dealing became a full-time activity, methamphetamine temporarily increased bodily capacities compatible with prolonged availability, vigilance, mobility, rapid response, and the accelerated demands of a criminalized drug market. This compatibility was unstable: tolerance, prolonged wakefulness, and cumulative exhaustion progressively undermined the capacity of methamphetamine to sustain the bodily conditions on which intensive dealing had come to rely. I conceptualize this deterioration as dealer fatigue. Generally, the concept of pharmacologically modulated habitus directs attention to the changing relationship between socially acquired dispositions, psychoactive effects, bodily capacities, and social field demands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ondřej Hejnal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: