Objective: To evaluate a clinically applicable split-bolus computed tomography urography (CTU) protocol combined with renal computed tomography angiography (CTA) by comparing image quality, radiation dose, and contrast medium volume with conventional multiphasic CTU. Methods: Patients with suspected urinary tract disease were prospectively enrolled and allocated to a modified split-bolus CTU plus renal CTA protocol (group A) or conventional CTU (group B). Group A underwent unenhanced CT, bolus-triggered renal arterial-phase CT, and a delayed comprehensive phase after a second contrast injection. Group B underwent conventional 4-phase CTU. A retrospective cohort of renal CTAs (group C) was included to compare the image quality of renal arteries. Objective CT attenuation, subjective image quality, dose-length product (DLP), effective dose (ED), and contrast medium volume were analyzed. Results: Among 153 prospective participants (group A, n=77; group B, n=76), visualization of the urinary collecting system did not differ significantly between groups A and B in CT attenuation or subjective scores (all P >0.05). Arterial attenuation and renal artery image quality were significantly higher in group A than in group B (all P <0.001), whereas subjective renal artery scores did not differ significantly between groups A and C ( P =0.324). Compared with group B, group A reduced DLP and ED by 29.9% and contrast medium volume by 14.4% (all P <0.001). Conclusions: The split-bolus CTU protocol, combined with renal CTA, may provide a feasible imaging option for selected patients requiring both urinary tract and renal arterial assessment, with reduced radiation exposure and contrast medium use, without compromising urinary tract image quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: