AbstractIntroduction To evaluate the effect of a basic life support (BLS) training program on nurses’ theoretical knowledge and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance and to examine whether post-training knowledge levels were associated with successful CPR performance in a simulation-based assessment.Design Prospective educational intervention study.Methods A total of 321 nurses participated in a standardized 45-minute BLS training session based on European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Theoretical knowledge was assessed using a 10-item knowledge test administered before and after training. CPR performance was evaluated immediately after training using a simulation-based cardiac arrest scenario and a structured 10-item checklist.Results Post-training knowledge scores increased significantly after training (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 4.2 ± 1.1; p < .001), with a large effect size (Cohen d = 0.97). Successful CPR performance was observed in 81.3% of participants. Post-training knowledge scores were weakly but significantly correlated with CPR success (r = .179; p = .001). Participants with successful CPR performance had higher post-training knowledge scores than those with unsuccessful performance (4.39 ± 1.14 vs 3.87 ± 1.03; p = .001).Conclusions Basic life support training was associated with a statistically significant improvement in nurses’ theoretical knowledge, and higher post-training knowledge scores were associated with better CPR performance in a simulation-based assessment. However, the absolute post-training knowledge score remained limited, indicating that a single brief training session may be insufficient to achieve a satisfactory level of theoretical mastery. These findings support the need for repeated, structured, and performance-based educational strategies to further develop resuscitation knowledge and skills among nurses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çirkinoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: