A data-driven kinetic framework based on Dual Kriging is developed to represent epoxy curing behavior and supply a local cure-rate function for finite element (FE) analysis. Error-controlled compression reduces 7200 isothermal observations to 187 points, with maximum and mean normalized reconstruction errors of 0.45% and 0.069%, respectively. The compressed interpolant reproduces the E-51 conversion histories measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), including their late-stage plateaus. A separable 245-node rate representation is implemented in a sequential thermo-chemo-mechanical analysis, combining E-51 experimental data at 55–70 °C with auxiliary Kamal–Sourour data at 30–50 °C. The two kinetics models produce similar temperature and strain histories during staged curing; both underestimate the measured temperature peak and late-stage contraction. Temperature interpolation is evaluated separately using independent DSC measurements for another epoxy system, with the rate model constructed entirely from experimental data. With the complete 70 °C curve withheld and six temperatures used for training, the peak-normalized rate root mean square error (RMSE) is 1.11%, and the apparent-conversion RMSE is 0.00271. Withholding each of the five interior temperatures in turn gives rate errors of 1.11–5.58%. Within this dataset, expanding the training-temperature set improves prediction more than increasing the node count along existing curves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Polymers