Skew-probabilistic neural networks (SkewPNN) blend Parzen classification with a skewed kernel and metaheuristic tuning. We adapt them to credit-risk probabilities as CRASK (Credit-Risk Adaptive Skew-normal Kernel): a skew-normal kernel with class- and feature-specific bandwidths, categorical smoothing and an adaptive multiplier, fitted by a self-excluded conditional log-loss. The lender’s question is whether these probabilities change acceptance decisions and losses. In an exploratory, fold-local benchmark on seven public credit data sets, CRASK with exact kernel sums improves AUC-ROC over the grid-tuned published-kernel SkewPNN baseline on average and on five of seven; with sums truncated to 150 neighbours, it improves log-loss on all seven after the same isotonic recalibration, and mean realised profit on the four outcome-labelled data sets. Logistic regression is ahead on average discrimination; tuned boosting, an explainable boosting machine and a tabular foundation model are ahead on discrimination, probability quality and profit. The raw posterior is over-dispersed (mean calibration slope 0.38); the recalibrated pipeline is the proposed probability model. In the rules tested, the fitted density adds nothing beyond a nearest-neighbour distance. In a retrospective comparison across one lender’s origination cohorts, not a real-time test, ranking transfers and the calibration loss lies at the clipped extreme blocks of the isotonic map.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bimoldan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: