A 100,000-neuron spiking network learns cued verb commands online, with no gradients, no backpropagation, and no offline retraining, in under a thousand episodes. Under a pre-specified four-seed protocol, it reaches 500/600 (83.3%) probe accuracy, beating frozen-plasticity, shuffled-cue, and random-reward controls at Fisher p ≤ 4.4×10⁻³⁷, with three of four seeds passing every bar. We tried to break the result before believing it. The first counted run failed its own both-seeds rule because the random-reward control turned out to be a plasticity-driven random walk that can wander above a working network; that FAIL is reported as it stands. A staged ladder found and fixed four measured defects first (starved cue-to-motor current, tonic-cue LTD collapse, a one-sided failure clamp, and a test-harness state leak that manufactured a false positive). The repaired rule survives a 20% noisy teacher and a 500 ms delayed reward. The rule runs inside OSCEN, a 1,156,800-neuron, 819-million-synapse spiking network with six concurrent online plasticity mechanisms and a developmental schedule. The paper also reports a negative result: across four pre-specified attempts on a two-joint arm, the network never acquired the first task, and consolidation still ran on 41.8% of synapses in a network that had learned nothing. A reduced form of the rule learns on BrainScaleS-2 analog neuromorphic silicon. Thirteen defects in our own experimental design are reported in full.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rio Bold (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: