Incremental hemodialysis (IHD) aligns treatment frequency with residual kidney function (RKF); however, direct outpatient programs and their operating rules are rarely described. We report a 10-year single-center program in Japan. We retrospectively studied 61 consecutive adults who initiated maintenance hemodialysis directly as outpatients on once- or twice-weekly schedules from July 2013 to July 2023; nine patients who initiated conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis were described separately. The starting frequency was selected through individualized written shared decision-making that considered creatinine clearance (Ccr), urine volume, nutrition, comorbidity, clinical judgment, adherence, activities of daily living, and patient preference without a numeric allocation threshold. Conservative kidney management without dialysis was presented to every patient as an alternative, and none chose it. Five prespecified criteria prompted a recommendation to increase the frequency. Survival time began at the first outpatient IHD session; death was the event, escalation did not censor follow-up, and transplantation was censored on the transplantation date. Ccr and urine volume were analyzed on an available-case basis. Of 70 adults, 61 (87.1%) started outpatient IHD (40 once weekly; 21 twice weekly). The median age was 63 years (IQR 49–72), the Charlson comorbidity index was 5 (4–7), and Ccr was 4.32 mL/min (3.26–6.71; n = 58). Over 2642 patient-months (median follow-up 39.1 months), nine patients died, six underwent transplantation by study end, and three were lost to follow-up. No death occurred within 90 days. Survival was 98.2% (95% CI 88.0–99.7) at 1 year and 87.3% (71.2–94.7) at 5 years. Thirty once-weekly initiators transitioned to twice-weekly treatment after a median of 6.1 months, and six transitioned directly to thrice-weekly treatment. Over 1709 reconstructed incremental patient-months, the dialysis-delivery fee scenario was 41.6% lower than the same exposure when valued at the thrice-weekly rate. Direct outpatient once- or twice-weekly IHD was operationally sustained for a decade. Selection based on RKF, clinical stability, and patient preference, together with the absence of a concurrent comparator, limits interpretation of these findings to feasibility and treatment pathways; they do not establish comparative effectiveness, safety, RKF preservation, or lower total costs. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: