Human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) has remained a major global health concern since its initial discovery, exerting profound impacts on both the physical health and psychosocial well-being of affected individuals and their communities. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is considered the cornerstone of HIV treatment, playing a critical role in improving patients’ quality of life and extending life expectancy. To assess the characteristics, antiretroviral (ARV) regimen distribution and virological suppression among outpatients undergoing HIV treatment at District 3 Health Center in 2024. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among people living with HIV receiving treatment at the Community Counseling and Support Unit for HIV/AIDS, District 3 Health Center, using data collected from participant questionnaires and retrospective clinical records. Among the 318 HIV patients surveyed, 96.23% were receiving first-line ARV regimens, while 3.77% were on second-line regimens. The TDF+3TC + DTG combination was the most commonly used regimen, accounting for 94.65% of cases. The findings showed that 98.69% of patients on first-line therapy and 91.67% of those on second-line therapy achieved virological suppression. Exploratory Firth penalized logistic regression showed nominal differences in virological non-suppression according to ethnicity, marital status, and same-sex relationship status. However, only five participants had virological non-suppression, and none of these comparisons remained statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. The prevalence of virological suppression was high, and most patients were receiving first-line ART, predominantly TDF+3TC + DTG. Larger studies with sufficient numbers of virological non-suppression events are needed to further investigate factors associated with virological outcomes. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: