Deep sequential network design requires choosing the number and placement of residual connections, while architecture-search methods are resource-intensive and do not localize structural defects. The objective is to diagnose pre-training inter-layer coupling decay and use it for minimal residual-topology correction. The procedure analyzes off-diagonal Hessian blocks and introduces a global collapse index and a maximum local drop. A greedy algorithm places residual connections based on the profile without training or gradient-based architecture search. The method is evaluated on multilayer perceptrons with an artificial bottleneck on CIFAR-10. Sixteen configurations with 8, 12, 16, or 20 blocks and base width 64 or 128 were evaluated with three initializations each (48 runs), along with a 16-block architecture of base width 256, bottleneck width 16, and bottleneck position 8. The Spearman correlation between the maximum local drop and final accuracy is –0.692; the p -value is less than 0.001. After architectural adjustment, no significant association with accuracy is detected. With a fixed one-edge budget, guided placement yields higher accuracy than random placement; the p -value is 0.019 (exploratory analysis). Soft Jaccard coefficients range from 0.9583 to 0.9722. For adjacent target blocks, the 90 % confidence interval for the paired accuracy difference lies within the equivalence bounds; the larger p -value of the two one-sided tests is 0.014. The Hessian profile localizes a coupling drop and guides residual intervention rather than serving as an independent predictor of training quality. Conclusions obtained are limited to networks with an artificial bottleneck.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolshim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: