Systemic iron overload precipitates progressive and often irreversible organ dysfunction, yet the clinical toolkit for non-invasive, organ-specific monitoring of iron accumulation remains inadequate. This study leverages a proteome-wide causal inference framework to identify circulating biomarkers that drive or reflect iron deposition in the liver, spleen, and pancreas. We integrated large-scale plasma pQTL data (n = 35,559) with GWAS summary statistics of organ-specific iron content using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). Candidate proteins were prioritized through Bayesian colocalization to identify shared genetic etiologies. The findings were validated in a systemic iron-overload mouse model, assessing the concordance between genetically predicted effects and experimental protein expression, histopathology, and systemic iron markers. MR analysis identified PRSS1 as a high-confidence causal mediator and prioritized BGLAP, FTMT, and ZHX3 as candidate proteins associated with tissue iron homeostasis. Genetically predicted BGLAP levels exhibited a negative causal effect on liver iron content (β = -0.294, P = 6.35 × 10⁻⁶), while FTMT and ZHX3 were positively associated with splenic iron accumulation. Notably, PRSS1 demonstrated a robust negative association with pancreatic iron (β = -0.217, P = 1.28 × 10⁻⁵) and showed strong evidence of genetic colocalization (PP.H4 = 0.982), suggesting a direct regulatory role. These MR-prioritized protein targets exhibited directionally concordant in vivo associations with organ iron accumulation and pharmacological iron chelation in mouse models of systemic iron overload. Our study establishes a genetically anchored proteomic map of systemic iron variation, prioritizing PRSS1 alongside BGLAP, FTMT, and ZHX3 as candidate proteins associated with organ-specific iron homeostasis. Rather than providing definitive clinical tools, these findings offer hypothesis-generating insights that warrant rigorous prospective validation in clinical iron-overload patient cohorts and dedicated functional models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: