Background/Objectives: Symptomatic breast services face increasing diagnostic demand, while younger women with benign-appearing ultrasound lesions frequently undergo biopsy despite a low prevalence of malignancy. This study evaluated whether a rule-based clinical decision algorithm combining patient age, clinician ultrasound assessment and artificial intelligence (AI) decision support could identify a subgroup in whom biopsy might be avoided without excluding malignancy from the biopsy pathway. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using prospectively collected service-evaluation data from 240 patients (254 lesions) attending a large NHS breast unit between May and December 2025. Clinician ultrasound assessment, KOIOS DS Breast AI output and histopathology were recorded. Lesions in women aged ≤ 35 years were eligible for biopsy avoidance when clinician assessment was U2 or U3 and the KOIOS AI assessment was BI-RADS 2. Histopathology was the reference standard. Secondary analyses compared clinician and AI diagnostic performance. An illustrative five-year budget impact analysis was undertaken from the NHS provider perspective. Results: Among 151 lesions in women aged ≤ 35 years, 146 were benign and five were malignant. The algorithm would have classified 87 lesions for biopsy avoidance (57.6%; 95% CI, 49.3–65.6%). Of these, 67 (77.0%) had a clinician U3 classification. All 87 were benign on histopathology (100%; 95% CI, 95.8–100%), while all five malignant lesions remained in the biopsy pathway. Clinician assessment showed higher specificity than AI (99.1% vs. 75.7%), whereas AI showed higher sensitivity (96.9% vs. 81.3%). Avoidance of 87 biopsies was associated with approximately £85,000 in gross cost offsets during the evaluation period in the illustrative economic model. Conclusions: The AI-supported clinical decision algorithm could substantially reduce benign biopsy activity in younger women while maintaining cancer detection in this cohort. The small number of malignancies, single-centre design and biopsy population mean that prospective multicentre validation is required before routine clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: