Political communication has become an increasingly important component of contemporary electoral politics as political parties and candidates seek to influence public opinion, construct political identities, mobilise voters and shape perceptions of leadership. The transformation of the media environment from a predominantly traditional system based on newspapers, radio and television to a hybrid communication ecosystem incorporating social media, online news platforms, messaging applications, podcasts, livestreaming and user-generated content has significantly altered the conduct of political campaigns. This study examines the role of traditional and digital media in presidential electoral strategy in Nigeria, with particular emphasis on how political actors use media to construct narratives, frame political issues, mobilise voters, manage political reputations and counter opponents. The study adopts a qualitative research design based on documentary analysis and critical review of scholarly literature, official electoral documents, media reports and relevant policy materials. The analysis demonstrates that neither traditional nor digital media can adequately explain contemporary electoral communication in isolation. Rather, Nigerian presidential campaigns operate within a hybrid media environment in which television and radio provide broad visibility and legitimacy, while digital platforms facilitate immediacy, interactivity, audience segmentation, peer-to-peer mobilisation and rapid narrative diffusion. The study argues that the strategic advantage in the 2027 election will not necessarily belong to the candidate with the largest media presence but to the campaign capable of integrating traditional and digital communication into a coherent, credible and locally responsive political communication architecture. The study recommends an integrated media strategy, evidence-based political messaging, ethical digital campaigning, stronger fact-checking mechanisms, media literacy, transparent political advertising and enhanced collaboration among electoral institutions, media organisations, technology platforms, political parties and civil society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajose et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: