Older adults with dengue have higher risks of adverse outcomes, but the contribution of age-related immune responses remains uncertain. We compared soluble mediators after ex vivo dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV-2) exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from older and middle-aged volunteer donors. PBMCs from 10 older donors (≥ 65 years; median age, 74.9 years; observed range, 65.8–92.0 years) and 10 middle-aged donors (20–64 years eligible; median age, 39.4 years; observed range, 34.8–49.1 years) were exposed to DENV-2 strain TH-36 at a multiplicity of infection of 5. Supernatants collected before exposure and at 24, 48, and 72 h were assayed for GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10, MCP-1, TNF-α, VEGF-A, galectin-3, and galectin-9. Between-group p values at each time point were unadjusted exploratory comparisons. Compared with middle-aged donor cultures, older donor cultures had higher galectin-3 concentrations at 48 and 72 h (median 363.6 versus 197.8 pg/mL, p = 0.0412; 810.1 versus 218.5 pg/mL, p = 0.0011) and higher galectin-9 at 72 h (219.6 versus 92.23 pg/mL, p = 0.0355). Concentrations of the seven other measured mediators were generally lower in older donor cultures at 24–72 h. IFN-γ, IL-10, and TNF-α also differed at baseline. Interpretation of the nominal p values is limited by the small sample and multiple comparisons. After ex vivo DENV-2 exposure, PBMC cultures from older donors had higher galectin-3 and galectin-9 concentrations at selected late time points and generally lower concentrations of the seven other measured mediators than cultures from predominantly middle-aged donors. This contrasting pattern highlights the value of examining galectins alongside other soluble mediators when investigating variation in responses to DENV-2. The small sample and culture model limit causal and clinical inference, and cytokine–galectin associations were not tested. Larger donor-linked experiments and studies in patients with dengue are needed to assess reproducibility and clinical relevance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: