Calreticulin ( CALR ) exon 9 mutations define a major molecular subgroup of essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis. Although the oncogenic interaction between mutant CALR and the thrombopoietin receptor MPL is well established, the factors that influence whether a newly arising CALR-mutant hematopoietic clone is eliminated, contained, or allowed to expand remain incompletely understood. The shared neomorphic C-terminal sequence generated by pathogenic CALR mutations creates an unusual model for studying driver-specific cancer immunoediting. Evidence accumulated over the past decade indicates that mutant CALR can elicit CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, yet naturally occurring and vaccine-induced immunity is frequently insufficient to control disease. Host immunogenetic variation may contribute to this discrepancy. HLA class I and class II genotypes influence the repertoire of mutant CALR-derived peptides that can be stably presented to T cells, whereas antigen processing additionally depends on proteasomal or endosomal cleavage, TAP transport, peptide-loading machinery, source-protein abundance, and other cellular factors. In parallel, natural killer cell surveillance is influenced by the NKG2D-MICA/MICB axis and by inhibitory KIR-HLA interactions. Recent studies have linked HLA genotypes, MICA / MICB and KLRK1 variation, and KIR receptor-ligand combinations to susceptibility to CALR -mutated or related myeloproliferative neoplasms, although most observations remain exploratory and have not been independently replicated. This review integrates direct CALR-mutated MPN evidence with comparative evidence from other MPN subtypes and mechanistic evidence from other malignancies or experimental systems, while explicitly distinguishing their levels of support. Current data support a model in which oncogenic signaling, inherited immune-recognition capacity, and acquired immune escape may jointly contribute to the evolutionary trajectory of CALR-mutant clones. Multicenter, ancestry-matched and functionally integrated studies are required before immunogenetic markers can be translated into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shivarov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: