The 2024 Electricity Market Design Reform introduced a new European framework for non-fossil flexibility. The first national flexibility needs assessments were published in July 2026, and indicative objectives and support schemes for non-fossil flexibility will soon be introduced. However, we argue that this new framework, which will influence the development of European power systems as they transition to low-carbon resources, is based on a flawed theoretical foundation and exhibits significant overlap with the European resource adequacy framework. No flexibility metric has been defined for the flexibility needs assessment. No flexibility standard/target has been calculated based on the economic equilibrium between the cost of additional flexibility and the cost of not relying on it. We identify three underlying metrics for flexibility needs, we present alternative approaches to define flexibility products and identify open questions that need to be addressed before the new flexibility framework moves to the implementation phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mastropietro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: