The article examines the impact of digital technologies on interrogation tactics and the functions of the investigator as a whole. It has been ascertained that automating routine tasks enables the investigator to focus on key aspects, while an intuitive approach to organizing and conducting interrogations is complemented by facts and analytics. The methodological, legal, and ethical aspects of implementing artificial intelligence technologies in the conduct of interrogations, as well as the risks of errors and data leaks, have been analyzed. Recommendations for further research are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovalev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: