Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents VIEWAnatomy, an interactive ontology alignment framework evaluated in the Anatomy track of OAEI 2026, in two variants. VIEWAnatomy-ML uses lexical similarities, K-Means and an ensemble of Random Forest, Naive Bayes and Multilayer Perceptron; it reaches precision 0.9640, recall 0.6365 and F-measure 0.7668 (1,001 correspondences). VIEWAnatomy-DL extends this pipeline with Sentence-BERT embeddings loaded via the Deep Java Library (DJL) and a global bidirectional 1:1 filter; it reaches precision 0.9509, recall 0.7672 and F-measure 0.8492 (1,223 correspondences). The ML→DL transition thus yields +0.1307 in recall and +0.0824 in F-measure at a cost of only −0.0131 in precision. Among the 14 official systems plus the two variants (16 entries), VIEWAnatomy-ML ranks 4th in precision and VIEWAnatomy-DL ranks 8th in precision and 11th in F-measure. The comparison shows that generic SBERT embeddings are an effective low-cost step from classical ML to deep learning , while domain-specific knowledge (SapBERT, UMLS) and LLM oracles remain the key differentiators of top systems. A roadmap targeting F-measure in the 0.955-0.960 range for OAEI 2027 is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberto Monteiro Dias (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: