Conventional Faraday‐based calculations often fail to accurately predict chitosan hydrogel electrodeposition because the measured deposit is a hydrated polymer gel rather than a dense dry electrochemical product. To address this limitation, an effective deposition coefficient, , was introduced into a corrected Faraday framework to relate electrical input to wet hydrogel volume. A cylindrical growth model was derived for platinum wire cathodes and fitted to thickness data obtained under galvanostatic deposition at 3–25 mA, yielding = 60.4 and R 2 = 0.929. The framework was further extended analytically to the planar‐electrode limit, showing that electrode geometry changes the predicted growth law. Characterization of the freeze‐dried deposit showed retained chitosan‐associated infrared features, a diffraction profile distinct from that of the starting powder, and irregular surface openings. Controlled cathode immersion geometry enabled proof‐of‐concept fabrication of stepped chitosan hydrogel structures. This work establishes a calibrated process framework for connecting electrochemical input, electrode geometry, and wet chitosan hydrogel coating formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: