For the planar Gaussian pair potential V(r) = e−π a r2 let E(a, t) be the harmonic zero-point energy per particle (ℏ = m = 1) of the unit-covolume Bravais lattices Lt = Pt Lρ, Pt = [[1, t], [t, 1 + t2]], sheared from the triangular lattice Lρ, and F(a, t) = ∂t2E(a, t) its exact second variation (not the majorant of the earlier B2 preprint, which cannot reach the sign changes). F is enclosed two-sided by ball arithmetic, in a form affine in a that lets intervals be chained, for every a in an interval and every |t| ≤ 10−8. Result. F < 0 on all of [0.425, 1.579] (71 chained intervals) and F > 0 on all of [1.584, 4] (103 chained intervals). Hence along the shear the triangular lattice is not a local minimum of the zero-point energy for every a in [0.425, 1.579] (E(a, t) < E(a, 0) for 0 < |t| ≤ 10−8), and E(a, 0) < E(a, t) for every a in [1.584, 4], a strict minimum along the shear. A strict local minimum over lattice shapes additionally needs C2, criticality, isotropy (order-3 stabiliser) and the two-dimensional second-derivative test, which are written arguments and not formalised. Each of (0.3745, 0.379) and (1.579, 1.583) contains a zero of a ↦ F(a, 0) (intermediate value theorem); uniqueness, and the absence of other zeros in the uncertified gaps, are not certified. Left of the first root only isolated points are certified (F > 0 at a = 0.33, 0.35, 0.36, 0.37, 0.372, 0.3745). Not claimed. The full equivalence between local minimality and a above the larger root, for all a > 0, is not claimed and is probably false: the earlier preprint P2 sees another sign change near a = 0.123 (Tier X). The intervals in (0.383, 0.425) and everything below 0.33 are not certified; at a = 0.25 and a = 0.30 the certifier could not prove det B > 0 (104 and 9 failed cells near Γ). Nothing is claimed for a > 4, other potentials, other lattices, three dimensions, or the total (classical plus zero-point) energy. Tier split. Tier A (Lean 4.34.1, Mathlib; axioms within propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound): the logic, the signs of 197 rational records, the interval-chain coverage (decide +kernel), the intermediate-value step and the window lemmas; the assembled theorems take the enclosures as explicit hypotheses. Tier C-ball: the Arb enclosures (python-flint 0.6.0, 96 bits; 1,276,022 certified cells over 202 distinct run records, 0 failed), not kernel-checked. Tier C-human: that F is the second derivative of E (so E is C2 in t), the mirror symmetry, continuity in a, and the isotropy and second-derivative steps for the strict claim over shapes. The headline is therefore Tier C overall; only its logic and arithmetic are Tier A. Controls. Just inside the window at a = 0.40 (negative enclosure; the kernel rejects a claimed local minimum), a tampered certificate (rejected), intervals straddling each root (no sign certified), a planted false sign in the unmodified LeanFlow certifier (rejected) with 197 true signs verified, planted sorry and planted axiom (caught by the axiom gate), and a floating-point cross-check at 609 points (0 misses). Status. Produced by AI agents (Claude) under the author's direction; the author is responsible for the content. An independent AI audit (producer != verifier, 2026-10-26) returned ACCEPT_WITH_CORRECTIONS with no blocking item; its corrections are applied in this version. No human has audited the work or the Lean statements, and there is no statement lock. Kernel replay (leanchecker, Lean 4.34.1, auditor-built oleans) is rc 0 for Programmes.ZeroPointClass.Cert, Controls, Honest and Basic, and for the imports ZeroPoint.Basic and ZeroPointCert.Basic. The Elenchus ledger gate exits with code 1 (0 blocking findings, 8 flags LEDGER_UNAUDITED_TIER_A, one per Tier A row). The repository guards antigravity_guard.py and test_rigor_guard.py fail for reasons that predate this work and are reported in the paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xavier Callens (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: