This conceptual and practice-oriented article examines the teacher poet as a productive identity position within English education. Drawing on Roz Ivanič’s theory of writing and identity, I argue that teachers’ participation in poetic writing can reshape pedagogical knowledge, classroom relationships and understandings of authorship. I develop the argument through four recursive movements: from writing history to writer identity; from explaining craft to experiencing craft; from evaluator to fellow writer; and from human authorship to AI-mediated authorship. Teacher-poet identity, I suggest, depends neither on publication nor on professional status, but develops through repeated acts of writing, revision, sharing and reflection. The article concludes with eight principles for writer-centred poetry pedagogies that foreground encounter, modelling, invitational sharing, authentic audiences, craft knowledge, relationship and critical human decision-making when generative AI is used, offered as provisional commitments for teachers to adapt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwin Creely (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: