The fragility parameter m and the fictive temperature Tf(t) are central quantities in the description of glass formation and structural arrest. Calorimetric studies have long established a connection between fragility, cooling rate, and the frozen fictive temperature. Here, we develop a microscopic dynamical basis for this connection by relating Tf(t) to configurational enthalpy fluctuations. The delayed configurational enthalpy response is governed by the normalized enthalpy-enthalpy time-correlation function, which also determines the configurational part of the frequency-dependent heat capacity. The fictive temperature follows from this delayed enthalpy response, while fragility enters separately through the temperature dependence of the structural relaxation time and hence through the material-time clock. This separation leads to a general memory expression for the full time-dependent Tf(t), with the familiar Tool equation emerging in the Debye limit. The formulation, therefore, distinguishes two roles: the enthalpy correlation function determines the relaxation kernel, whereas fragility determines how rapidly that kernel is traversed during cooling. The conventional cooling-rate dependence of the frozen fictive temperature then appears as a limiting consequence rather than the starting point of the theory. Quantitative prediction deep in the nonequilibrium glass requires a continuation of the structural clock to depend on both T and Tf.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biman Bagchi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: