Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
First-party technical note analyzing 428 saved Jev 1.13.0 public predictions for 214 before/after fix pairs. At score > 0.7, 107 broken methods and one repaired method are flagged. At score >= 0.7, 113 broken methods and one repaired method are flagged. Includes a pinned source revision and SHA-256, a runnable notebook, Python reproduction code, and CSV. No model requests are required to reproduce the calculations. Requirements were written with knowledge of the fixes; this is not a study of live agents or an identical-protocol ranking of PR review products. This is a first-party technical note by Perch / Verglas LLC. It is not a peer-reviewed paper. Source data: pinned public benchmark predictions. Source code: Perch on GitHub. Technical note and runnable notebook. Narrative and results are CC BY 4.0; reproduce.py and notebook code cells are MIT licensed. See LICENSE.txt for attribution and the complete code license.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verglas LLC (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: