Positionality statements too often take the form of a static list—a demographic snapshot presented once and left behind. This article argues for something else: positionality as a process of becoming. Drawing on ethnographic, feminist, and critical theory literatures, as well as my experiences as an immigrant, multilingual evaluator, I propose transient positionality as a dynamic, relational, and context-dependent framework. It encompasses three interconnected dimensions: fluid positionality, which shifts across time and contexts; relational positionality, which emerges through relationships with interest holders; and perspectival positionality, a term I introduce to describe how positionality is shaped by the social locations of others. Drawing on the concept of the ethnographic toolkit, I explain how this transience is not passive but requires active, intentional engagement. I conclude by considering how transient positionality can enhance the quality of evaluation by making the inquiry process more authentic and transparent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satlaj Dighe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: