Cryptochrome 1a (CRY1a) mediates blue-light signalling in tomato, but its contribution to acclimation to combined blue and green light remains unresolved. We compared wild-type (WT) and cry1 plants under white fluorescent light (WFL), blue light (BL), green light (GL), and BL/GL using gas exchange, A/Ci curves, chlorophyll fluorescence, pigment composition, electron microscopy, transcript abundance, and phenolic metabolism. Under BL, cry1 had a lower photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, and Y(II), despite higher chlorophyll content and grana area. Under BL/GL, the photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance were approximately 35% lower in cry1, and Vcmax, Jmax, and TPU decreased by 48–57%. Y(II) was lower, and Y(NO) was higher in cry1 than in WT. Under BL/GL, the grana area was lower in cry1, whereas the starch-grain area, stroma area, and plastoglobule number showed small differences that were not statistically significant. Transcript responses varied among spectra and functional groups. These results support a contribution of CRY1a to the coordination of structural and physiological acclimation to light quality. The BL/GL response is consistent with an imbalance between CO2 supply and carbon utilization that may promote photoprotective feedback.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vereshchagin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: