This study examines the relationship between proactive personality and emotional labor strategies (i.e., deep acting and surface acting), with particular attention to the mediating role of psychological ownership and the moderating effect of role overload within the mediating relationships. Cross-sectional data were collected from 330 full-time service employees in South Korea. Hypotheses were tested using multiple regression analyses supplemented by the PROCESS macro for mediation and moderated mediation analyses. Results showed that proactive personality was positively related to psychological ownership, and psychological ownership was positively associated with deep acting. No significant relationship emerged between psychological ownership and employees’ use of surface acting. The mediation analysis supported the role of psychological ownership as apartial mediator linking proactive personality to deep acting. Contrary to expectations, the moderated mediation analyses results showed that role overload strengthened rather than weakened the indirect effects via psychological ownership, indicating that under certain high-demand conditions, psychological ownership may become amore potent motivational resource for proactive employees. Implications for Central European audience: This study advances emotional labor research by identifying proactive personality as akey antecedent and psychological ownership as amotivational mechanism. It challenges traditional resource-depletion models by suggesting that, under high role overload, psychological ownership may serve as amotivational resource for proactive employees in ways different from conventional expectations. Practically, organizations can benefit by selecting proactive individuals and fostering psychological ownership through autonomy and support. When paired with enabling resources, job demands like role overload may function as motivational challenges. Aligning personality traits, psychological resources, and work design can enhance authentic emotional labor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: