Key result
IVUS-guided DES implantation reduces MACE ~40% compared to angiography guidance.
Why the study?
Previous evidence suggesting that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance improves outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement was largely driven by observational studies.
Does intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance reduce major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis compared to angiography guidance in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation?
Meta-Analysis (n=3,192)
Open-label
Yes
Does intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance reduce major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis compared to angiography guidance in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 7 RCTs confirms that IVUS-guided DES implantation definitively reduces MACE and repeat revascularization compared to angiography guidance, though it lacks sufficient statistical power to prove a reduction in stent thrombosis.
// Cheng Qian 1 , Hong Feng 1 , Jianlei Cao 1 , Guangyu Zhang 1 and Yanggan Wang 1 1 Department of Cardiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China Correspondence to: Yanggan Wang, email: wb000813@whu.edu.cn Keywords: intravascular ultrasound, drug-eluting stents, meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, randomized controlled trials Received: July 28, 2016 Accepted: July 11, 2017 Published: July 27, 2017 ABSTRACT Objective: Previous evidence suggested that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance could improve outcomes after drug-eluting stents (DES) placement, largely driven by data from observational studies. We, therefore, performed a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials to overcome this limitation. Results: The retrieval process yielded 7 RCTs with 3,192 patients. Compared to the angiography guidance, IVUS-guided DES implantation was associated with a significant reduction in the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.78; P P = 0.02) and target lesion revascularization (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; P = 0.004). IVUS and conventional angiography guidance showed similar incidence of stent thrombosis (ST) (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25-1.23; P = 0.15), cardiac death (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.19-1.15; P = 0.10) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.45-1.61; P = 0.62). Trial sequential analysis revealed a definite reduction in MACE with IVUS guidance without solid evidence for ST. Materials and Methods: A systematical literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials. gov , complemented with reference screening from relevant articles. Primary endpoints were MACE and ST. Conclusions: IVUS-guided DES implantation is associated with a lower risk of MACE and revascularization without conclusive benefits for ST.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2017) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation (predominantly complex lesions) (n=3,192). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided drug-eluting stent implantation vs. Angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.78, p=<0.001). IVUS-guided DES implantation significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events compared to angiography guidance (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.78, P<0.001; NNT 27).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: