Key result
Nurse-led education improves CHD self-care management by ~24 points over usual care.
Why the study?
Structured educational interventions show promise for coronary heart disease self-care management, but robust methodological evaluation using baseline-adjusted models was needed to establish efficacy in improving knowledge, attitudes, and self-care behaviors.
Does a 4-week structured nurse-led educational program improve knowledge, attitudes, and self-care management behaviors in outpatient coronary heart disease patients?
Does a 4-week structured nurse-led educational program improve knowledge, attitudes, and self-care management behaviors in outpatient coronary heart disease patients?
A 4-week structured nurse-led educational intervention significantly improves short-term knowledge, attitudes, and self-care management behaviors among outpatient coronary heart disease patients compared to usual care.
May support structured education for CHD self-care; leaves open causal efficacy in randomized trials.
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of global cardiovascular mortality, requiring comprehensive self-care management. Structured educational interventions show promise, but robust methodological evaluation using baseline-adjusted models is necessary to establish efficacy. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a structured educational intervention on knowledge, attitudes, and self-care management behaviors among CHD patients. Method: A non-randomized quasi-experimental pretest–posttest study was conducted with 156 outpatient CHD patients assigned to an intervention group (n = 78; receiving a 4-week structured nurse-led educational program) or a control group (n = 78; receiving usual care). Sample size was determined a priori using GPower (f = 0.25, α= 0.05, power = 0.80). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately post-intervention using validated questionnaires (Cronbach’s α= 0.79–0.84). Primary analysis utilized Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline pretest scores and potential confounders, alongside Bonferroni-Holm adjustments and multivariable linear regression. Results: Baseline scores were comparable between groups (p > 0.50). Post-intervention, baseline-adjusted ANCOVA revealed significantly higher scores in the intervention group compared to controls across all outcomes: Knowledge (adjusted mean difference 23.03; F(1,152) = 382.4, p < 0.001, ∂h2 = 0.71; dppc = 1.42), Attitude (adjusted mean difference 21.19; F(1,152) = 412.1, p < 0.001, ∂h2 = 0.73; dppc = 1.38), and Total Self-Care Management (adjusted mean difference 24.40; F(1,152) = 345.8, p < 0.001, ∂h2 = 0.69; dppc = 1.29). Multivariable linear regression indicated that intervention assignment demonstrated the strongest standardized association with self-care improvements (β= 0.764, p < 0.001), followed by education level (β = 0.152, p < 0.001) and prior healthcare information sources (β = 0.098, p = 0.017). Conclusion: A structured educational intervention significantly improves short-term knowledge, attitudes, and self-care management in outpatient CHD patients. Integrating structured nurse-led education into routine outpatient cardiac rehabilitation is recommended, while considering individual educational levels and illness duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rondonuwu et al. (2026) studied Coronary heart disease (n=156). Structured nurse-led educational program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Knowledge, attitudes, and total self-care management behaviors (MD 24.40, p=<0.001). A 4-week structured nurse-led educational program significantly improved knowledge (MD 23.03), attitudes (MD 21.19), and self-care management (MD 24.40; all p<0.001) vs usual care in CHD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: